Reevaluating Fasting Before Cardiac Catheterization: Safety and Outcomes of Oral Intake Under Minimal to Moderate Sedation
Highlight
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (N=3,382) evaluating fasting versus nonfasting prior to cardiac catheterization under minimal to moderate sedation.
- No significant difference in primary safety outcomes including nausea/vomiting, aspiration, hypoglycemia, hypotension, and acute kidney injury between fasting and nonfasting groups.
- No cases of intubation reported in either group, indicating a very low risk of airway compromise with nonfasting.
- Subgroup analyses suggest potential increased nausea/vomiting with fasting and decreased acute kidney injury, but overall clinical impact remains uncertain.
Study Background
MedXY registered readers
Sign in free to continue reading
Create or use your MedXY account to unlock the complete article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.