We use cookies

Our website uses essential cookies and, with your consent, additional cookies to measure performance and improve our services. Cookie Policy.

You can change your choice at any time.

MMedXYNews
HomeVideos
MedXY AI/MedXY News/Section: Clinical Updates

Approved Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Assessments

MedXY Editorial Team•Aug 11, 2026•Clinical Updates
biologicsCost-Effectivenessbimekizumabsecukinumabhidradenitis suppurativaadalimumab

Highlights

  • Adalimumab remains the dominant cost-efficient biologic for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) across multiple international health systems.
  • Bimekizumab demonstrates superior or comparable clinical efficacy versus other biologics, notably IL-17 inhibitors, with durable long-term benefits and favorable safety profiles.
  • Secukinumab shows sustained efficacy up to two years with robust safety, though cost-effectiveness varies by region due to pricing variability.
  • Mechanistic studies highlight dual IL-17A/IL-17F blockade as a promising therapeutic strategy, reflecting HS pathogenesis complexity involving neutrophilic inflammation.

Background

MedXY registered readers

Sign in free to continue reading

Create or use your MedXY account to unlock the complete article.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Related articles

Open language-specific specialty feeds and department pages.

Biologic Outcomes in Severe Asthma by Smoking Status: Insights from the SHARP European RegistrySHARP registry data reveal that biologic therapies improve clinical outcomes equally in severe asthma patients irrespective of smoking status, challenging prevailing prescribing hesitancy and advocating inclusive treatment approaches.Sep 27, 2026Cost-Effectiveness of Thoracentesis with Pleural Fluid Cytology Versus Thoracoscopy with Pleural Biopsy in Diagnosing Malignant Pleural EffusionThis study evaluates when thoracentesis or thoracoscopy is more cost-effective in diagnosing malignant pleural effusion in patients with prior or active malignancy, highlighting thresholds of pleural fluid cytology sensitivity guiding optimSep 24, 2026Standalone Salpingectomy for Primary Ovarian Cancer Prevention: A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisThis review synthesizes evidence on the cost-effectiveness of standalone salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention, highlighting its benefits primarily in women at moderately elevated risk, especially between ages 45-50, supporting tailorSep 23, 2026
Loading comments...
MedXY briefing

Get the free newsletter

Evidence-led clinical news, trends, and analysis—delivered to your inbox.

Ask MedXY AI

Most popular

Intimate Health
Five Benefits for Women Continuing Sexual Activity After Menopause
Intimate Health
Why Some Women Have a Strong Sex Drive—And Why Men Shouldn't Worry About It
Nursing & care
How often should a couple have sex?
General Surgery
Optimizing Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions After Intra-Abdominal Cancer Surgery: Comparing the 5x-Multiplier and 3-Tier Models
Intimate Health
Classic Intimacy Recommendations: How to Help Women Reach Orgasm and Enjoy Mutual Pleasure
© 2026 MedXY
Contact usAbout usPrivacy PolicyMedXY story
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Balancing Safety, Efficacy, and Cost with a Novel Risk Calculator
This study compares robotic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, highlighting robotic surgery’s advantages in safety for high-risk and obese patients despite higher costs, and introduces a predictive risk calculator to aid surgical decis
Sep 21, 2026
From Mild-to-Moderate to Severe Asthma: Risk Factors and Patient Profiles from the NORDSTAR Cohort and Advances in Severe Asthma ManagementThis review summarizes the progression risk from mild-to-moderate to severe asthma based on the NORDSTAR cohort and integrates emerging evidence on biologic therapies that improve severe asthma outcomes across diverse patient profiles.Sep 17, 2026
Comparative Efficacy of Mepolizumab and Dupilumab in Eosinophilic COPD: Insights from a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Treatment ComparisonA recent MAIC study comparing mepolizumab and dupilumab in eosinophilic COPD patients found no significant difference between the treatments in reducing exacerbations or improving quality of life.Aug 23, 2026