Angioembolization vs. Surgery in Penetrating Hepatic Trauma: Balancing Survival and Hospital Stay
Highlight
- Angioembolization in penetrating liver trauma achieves survival rates comparable to surgical intervention.
- Compared to surgery, angioembolization is associated with significantly longer hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and prolonged ventilator dependency.
- Lower systolic blood pressure on admission, higher abdominal injury severity, and increased transfusion requirements predict need for adjunctive angioembolization post-surgery.
- Early risk stratification may optimize the combined use of surgery and angioembolization to improve outcomes.
Study Background
MedXY registered readers
Sign in free to continue reading
Create or use your MedXY account to unlock the complete article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
